Human Systems and Behavior

An analysis of the efficiency gains and externalized costs of AI-assisted targeting in modern warfare, with a focus on the U.S. Department of Defense's Project Maven.

For 80 years, 14 African nations have used a currency created by France

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is often celebrated as a shortcut to development. But for many developing countries, the reality resembles an old colonial plantation: foreign‑owned enclaves extract cheap labor, land, and tax breaks, while profits flow back to wealthy home countries. Local economies receive low‑wage jobs but little industrial deepening.

The previous three parts have traced a grim continuity: from colonial plantations to Mexico’s IMMEX program to the special economic zones of Vietnam, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and beyond. In each case, foreign capital gains access to cheap labour, tax breaks, and unrestricted profit repatriation, while the host country receives low‑wage jobs but little industrial deepening. This is not development; it is extraction.

The Mexican IMMEX model did not emerge in isolation. It is one variant of a global policy template promoted by international financial institutions, bilateral donors, and development agencies since the 1980s. Today, dozens of countries operate Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and export‑processing zones (EPZs) that offer foreign investors the same deal: duty‑free imports, tax holidays, weak labour protections, and unrestricted profit repatriation. In exchange, they receive jobs – but rarely the kind of industrial deepening that builds self‑sustaining economies.

If the colonial plantation was the original extraction machine, Mexico’s IMMEX (Industria Manufacturera, Maquiladora y de Servicios de Exportación) program is its most sophisticated 21st‑century descendant. Launched in 2006 as a successor to the earlier maquiladora scheme, IMMEX now encompasses over 3,000 plants, employs more than 1 million workers, and accounts for roughly half of Mexico’s exports. Yet the economic structure remains eerily familiar: foreign ownership, low wages, minimal local value‑added, and a legal framework designed to repatriate profits rather than reinvest them.

The modern enthusiasm for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in developing countries often overlooks a troubling historical precedent. Before the era of global supply chains and special economic zones, there was the colonial plantation system. For centuries, European powers established enclave economies in Asia, Africa, and the Americas designed for one purpose: extraction.

A five-part series examining the system-level failure hidden behind displacement statistics: 117 million people forcibly displaced worldwide, a median exile duration exceeding 20 years, and an international framework built around a crisis it was never designed to make permanent.

A five-part series examining why the countries best endowed with natural resources are so frequently the worst governed, and how the arithmetic of commodity dependence — not culture, not climate, not colonial history alone — explains the pattern.

A satirical exercise in the tradition of Machiavelli's* The Prince *— examining the mechanics of state capture through the eyes of those who would engineer it.